- Navigation
Results 171 to 176 of 176
Thread: leaning out tune?
-
07-08-2017, 05:37 PM #171Administrator
- Status
- Offline
- Join Date
- Nov 2012
- Name
- Shaun
- Vehicle
- 1994 Formula
- Location
- Phillipsburg NJ
- Posts
- 7,439
Supporting Member2021 Charger Scat 392
1994 Firebird Formula 381 stroker - Carrying the torch! - 9.90 @ 134.3mph on a 200 shot
1994 Camaro Vert - SBE LE1 Summit 8802 Cam - The CruiserThe wrench/driver for LTConvert's 94 Z28- Ellwein 383/LE Trickflows/ D1SC / CPT Ultra Pro Race 4L60E/Holley Terminator EFI
10.78 @ 125mph. Shooting for 9.99 for Frank Cahall!
-
The Following User Says Thank You to SSlowBoat For This Post:
-
07-08-2017, 07:06 PM #172LTx Guru
- Status
- Offline
- Join Date
- Apr 2013
- Name
- Fred
- Vehicle
- 1994 Formula - SOLD
- Location
- Central NJ
- Posts
- 2,326
Just a thought.... his LTFT's were all substantially below 128. A vacuum leak would drive them above 128. The MAF seemed to be reading too high at idle. Again, opposite of a vacuum leak. In both data logs I mentioned a potential problem with the MAF readings being higher than I have normally seen. That would over fuel it and drop the LTFT'S down.
SOLD - GONE TO A (VERY) GOOD HOME ! - 94 Formula A3+1: 381ci forged stroker - Callies Stealth, Oliver 5.85 billet rods, BME nitrous pistons / CNC LT4 heads / CC solid roller / TH400+GearVendors OD / 4.11 Strange 12-bolt / 300-shot N2O / Spohn Suspension / roll bar / MoTeC M48 Pro engine management system /a few other odds 'n ends.
-
07-08-2017, 07:56 PM #173Lurker
- Status
- Offline
- Join Date
- Apr 2013
- Name
- Johnny
- Vehicle
- 1994 formula A4
- Location
- Henderson, TN
- Posts
- 935
@Injuneer
thats what was confusing the heck out of me, they were reading below 128 witch would mean it's running rich. But when I added fuel it smoothed everything out witch was making me think maybe it had a vaccum leak? When I would take fuel away the computer would get closer to 128 but the jerking and poping would actually get worse.
Now is SD it is running phenomenal, gonna work on the idle at start up and leave the rest along untill I get a wideband.
-
07-15-2017, 03:32 PM #174Lurker
- Status
- Offline
- Join Date
- Apr 2013
- Name
- Johnny
- Vehicle
- 1994 formula A4
- Location
- Henderson, TN
- Posts
- 935
Put about 300 miles on the car just running open loop and it seems to be doing fine. I just spent hours trying to adjust the ve tables to get it to run correctly in closed loop and NOTHING I do makes it any better.
Cant find any exhaust leaks, all sensors SEEM to be working fine.
So my question is how bad is it on the car to be driving 100% of the time in open loop?Last edited by fullforce; 07-15-2017 at 05:34 PM.
-
09-04-2017, 05:56 PM #175
-
09-04-2017, 06:54 PM #176Lurker
- Status
- Offline
- Join Date
- Apr 2013
- Name
- Johnny
- Vehicle
- 1994 formula A4
- Location
- Henderson, TN
- Posts
- 935
Well I never fixed my closed loop surge. I've been running open loop for 1500 miles and it runs perfect.
Bookmarks