- Navigation
Results 11 to 20 of 20
-
03-26-2014, 06:30 PM #11
InActive Member
- Status
- Offline
- Join Date
- Nov 2013
- Posts
- 27
I thought so too.. but I don't have enough knowledge to know what sounds right and what doesn't. Naturally aspirated, I could tell exactly everything that would work well with anything. Turbo... no idea... all of them keep telling me that I dont need to go big for a turbo application... and they were more concerned about the boost PSI I planned on running than my horsepower goal.
... What would you suggest BLACKBIRDws6 ?
...especially since im going to be running AFR 210 heads on a 330ci motor... granted its forced induction but still they are pretty big for that size motor and flow up to .650 lift and theyre only telling me lifts around .530...Last edited by Z28lt1rocket; 03-26-2014 at 06:34 PM.
-
03-26-2014, 06:33 PM #12
Any mid frame T4 unit will work fine.
PT7675, the TC7875, Comp 7675 are all popular small turbos. You can step up to a PT88 on a T4 if you can find one, or get the new PT8847.
Or, be brave, run a T6 flange and get a S475, S480 etc...Correlation does not imply causation.
Una salus victis nullam sperare salutem
-
03-26-2014, 09:56 PM #13Xtreme Member
- Status
- Offline
- Join Date
- Apr 2010
- Name
- Brian DeLuca
- Vehicle
- 1997 Trans Am WS6
- Location
- Piscataway, NJ
- Posts
- 1,297
Cam choice will be determined by a number of factors. I'm not sure if you plan on putting together yourself but I would ask the guy who will be building your heads/intake setup what would be best. For my build, I spoke with Lloyd Elliot and he provided a lot of great info which helped me decide on a cam. I would assume a cam in the 226/230s range with lift nearing .590 on a 115lsa may be ideal. You will need a good valvetrain with solid seat pressure to avoid floating the valves at high rpm. Going with more duration can allow a bit more lift to help keep the valve stable.
97 T/A Ram Air Convt - 10.2@140 / 777rwhp - Forever Dyno Queen
17 Corvette Z06 - 11.05 @ 125
17 GMC Sierra Denali Dmax
-
03-26-2014, 10:01 PM #14
InActive Member
- Status
- Offline
- Join Date
- Nov 2013
- Posts
- 27
ok thanks BLACKBIRDws6 and SHOWNOMERCY.
-
03-26-2014, 10:06 PM #15
InActive Member
- Status
- Offline
- Join Date
- Nov 2013
- Posts
- 27
another thing is what should the ring end gap be or should I use gapless rings ? and whats the benefit and drawbacks?
-
03-26-2014, 11:31 PM #16Long Live the Opti
- Status
- Offline
- Join Date
- Sep 2008
- Name
- Sean
- Vehicle
- 1999 Twin Turbo Corvette
- Location
- Fort Wayne, IN
- Posts
- 12,072
turbo cams vs blower cams are two different animals. Remember the owner of PTK, I do believe he went over 900 with a 76GTS on a 355 with a 218 single pattern cam. I've talked this over with Lloyd also and am currently stepping down from the 234/244 .610/.610 110* cam that was in my car to a 223 single pattern, .575 lift, 113* lsa cam and expect to pick up a lot under the curve, make more power, and carry power higher and farther than the old one because I'm not blowing boost out the exhaust.
-
03-27-2014, 06:30 AM #17Xtreme Member
- Status
- Offline
- Join Date
- Apr 2010
- Name
- Brian DeLuca
- Vehicle
- 1997 Trans Am WS6
- Location
- Piscataway, NJ
- Posts
- 1,297
Best to check with the ring manufacturer. For reference, my top gapless ring is at .030 since I am around 19lbs of boost. I had a bad experience with my last gapless ring set but it was determined they weren't the problem but my cylinder bores were. Supposedly the gapless sets will provide a better seal than conventional but you will hear comments go back and forth. The guy who recently refreshed my engine recommended the gapless again so that's what I went with.
I agree completely with your first statement. The rest as mentioned comes down to having someone with experience making a recommendation since this wouldn't be a typical build. There are so few working turbo lt1 builds for reference which make it a challenge to try and compare one build to another for part reference. 900hp is doable but still a lofty goal considering few have done it and usually it's with more cubes. I know a big cam isn't necessary here.
97 T/A Ram Air Convt - 10.2@140 / 777rwhp - Forever Dyno Queen
17 Corvette Z06 - 11.05 @ 125
17 GMC Sierra Denali Dmax
-
03-27-2014, 07:10 AM #18
Fastbird, I run a LE 224/224, you will like it.
I run regular piston rings from JE, nothing fancy. So far, they seem to be working, I also went with their recommended gaps which was around .025 I think.Correlation does not imply causation.
Una salus victis nullam sperare salutem
-
03-27-2014, 07:31 AM #19
Everyone is correct, Like said your compression is way too low even for the 331, it will be horrible on the street from a stoplight, Mine is at 9.4.1, custom cam with a 78mm Turbo, T4. on 10lbs it has made 703 HP so far, no meth, Just to give you an idea. Lag? everyone at the shootout saw what the lag did to my Dennys Nitrous Drive Shaft...
-
03-27-2014, 07:33 AM #20"The Rock"
- Status
- Offline
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Name
- Popo
- Vehicle
- 1996 Impala with the heart of the old camaro. 1993 Corvette..
- Location
- Shillington, Pennsylvania, United States
- Posts
- 61,345
Our BIG MOMENT @ the 2012 LTXshootout
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=521756391174175
1996 Camaro Z28: RIP 09/25/2016
1994 Trans Am GT: SOLD 05/2017
1985/1996GS clone: SOLD
1996 Impala SS H/C, LT, with true dual exhaust, 4.10s, lowered, with CPT trans, many cosmetic mods, and a whole lot more to come...
2002 Caddilac EscaladeL CAI, lowered, 6.0 , AWD..
Bookmarks