Become a ltxtech.com member, Click here to register!

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 14 of 14
  1. #11
    InActive Member


    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Vehicle
    1994 Trans am
    Location
    burlington iowa
    Posts
    262

    Default

    im contemplating a similar thing here but I have a cc306 cam and valve train but the vortech headshave oversized valves and since I gotta change springs I figured a little port wrk would be in order, would the heating be a issue or not?

  2. #12
    MAD ABOUT LTX's


    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Name
    Mike
    Vehicle
    1993 Camaro Z/28 A4 2006 Chevrolet Avalanche 1500 1970 Firebird Espirit, 1972 Camaro Sport Coupe
    Location
    Vallejo Ca (SF Bay Area)
    Posts
    1,609

    Default

    I could be wrong but I was told long ago that an iron head keeps more thermal energy in the cylinder and that equals power but generally aluminum heads have more research-work ect done to them so they make more power then the run of the mill iron head. I would stick with the stock alloy heads if it were me.
    If you don't stand behind our MIlitary then feel free to stand in front of them. <---- This is my oldest son (PROUD DAD HERE) Mike (just plain mad) Madman337 1993 Camaro Z/28 A4 all stock other than a muffler and LCAs @292K+ miles. 2006 Chevrolet Avalanche. 1970 Pontiac Firebird. 1972 Camaro, 1994 Corvette, ​17 Fusion Sport AWD V6 Twin Turbo

  3. #13
    "The Hammer"


    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Name
    JimmyMo
    Vehicle
    1994 Trans Am
    Location
    In your kitchen, stealing your snacks...
    Posts
    2,531

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Madman337 View Post
    I could be wrong but I was told long ago that an iron head keeps more thermal energy in the cylinder and that equals power but generally aluminum heads have more research-work ect done to them so they make more power then the run of the mill iron head. I would stick with the stock alloy heads if it were me.
    In this case the LT1 iron heads were in development 6 months longer than the aluminum heads. The Vortecs are basically the LT1 iron head except with standard flow coolant provisions. They flow more than the aluminum heads stock to stock (I think 202 intake Al to 230 iron is the general concensus, but I haven't flowed either set of heads myself, so don't quote me), but the advantage isn't there to justify going to the iron heads unless that's what is already on the engine.
    The iron heads don't dissipate heat as quickly as the aluminum heads do, which in theory means that for a given compression ratio the iron heads will make a little more power due to the retained combustion heat. The downside to this is that the iron heads are more prone to heat soak, which can lead to pre ignition problems if the heads get too hot.
    "Only in the Corps can you put three guys in a room with an anvil and a rubber mallet, come back 15 min later, and the anvil is broken, the rubber mallet is missing, and nobody saw a damned thing!"

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to 94Blackbird For This Post:


  5. #14
    InActive Member


    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    New Mexico
    Posts
    125

    Default

    The cast iron 96 Impalla SS cast iron heads were the best flowing stock heads for the LT1. Aluminum LT1 561,374,643's in order of best to least flowing.

    Here is a list of various smallblock chevy heads flow tested Stock along with aftermarket heads. Includes LT1 374's LT4's and vortecs.


    http://purplesagetradingpost.com/sum...orld Sportsman


    Post #20 Lloyd Elliot
    http://www.camaroz28.com/forums/lt1-...s-62301/page2/



    Numbers vary with the cylinder head and the flow bench operator along with testing parameters.

    http://carprogrammer.com/Z28/Cylinde..._head_flow.htm


    Results of cylinder head porters and aftermarket manufacturers vary as well. Think the best Flow to use is the average.

    http://www.fierolt1.com/lt1_lt4_headflow.htm


    In this exerpt from the table I think the results are listed Wrong The 96SS Cast iron Impalla SS numbers are 230I/147E @.0500 Lift as the extra flow was developed and used as prototype for the cast Iron 96-97 Vortec heads casting numbers 062 and 906 3 sawtooth heads.

    Avg stock Lt1


    60.2 119.1 170.9 198.9 206.4 200.9 46.1 93.6 123.5 141.2 153.2 156.0 1110.8 5615.0 424.3 71.9% 798.4
    LT1 Cast Iron Stock (Impala 94/5) 55.0 119.0 179.0 214.0 230.0 48.0 91.0 128.0 140.0 147.0 1112.4 5576.5 472.9 70.4% 783.3
    LT1 Cast Iron Stock (Impala 96) 58.0 117.0 174.0 207.0 221.0 57.0 107.0 135.0 146.0 150.0 1111.6 5525.8 454.4 70.8% 786.8



    http://www.onedirt.com/tech-stories/...k-chevy-heads/
    Last edited by Viper; 03-11-2013 at 03:27 AM. Reason: Spelling

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •