Dirtybob
01-10-2018, 06:05 PM
I've been kicking around the idea of adding some 1.6 rockers to my (stock motor) '95 roady. I'll be replacing the valve springs either way.
Did some hunting for flow numbers of stock iron heads and found some discrepancies in the info, was hoping someone could verify the data I found. Mainly concerned with the flow (rise or lack thereof) between .400 and .500 lift.
Also if anybody added 1.6s to their stocker b body and has dragstrip numbers to share, that would be great.
1st data set: lift/intake/exhaust
.100 69.8/53.9
.200 138.5/112.5
.300 195.9/148.0
.400 231.0/159.0
.500 232.2/161.6
.600 236.1/165.8
If these numbers are relatively correct, there would be no point in going to 1.6 rockers or a cam with more than mid .400s lift. FWIW I saw several flow charts for stock alum. heads that were also 'flat' from .400 lift up.
And then there's these numbers...
2nd data set: lift/intake/exhaust
.100 55.0/48.0
.200 119.0/91.0
.300 179.0/128.0
.400 214.0/140.0
.500 230.0/147.0
3rd data set:
.100 58.0/57.0
.200 117.0/107.0
.300 174.0/135.0
.400 207.0/146.0
.500 221.0/150.0
If sets 2&3 are 'accurate' then there should be some advantage to pushing the valve lift closer to .500 ...
Anyways, feedback would be appreciated.
Thanks
Did some hunting for flow numbers of stock iron heads and found some discrepancies in the info, was hoping someone could verify the data I found. Mainly concerned with the flow (rise or lack thereof) between .400 and .500 lift.
Also if anybody added 1.6s to their stocker b body and has dragstrip numbers to share, that would be great.
1st data set: lift/intake/exhaust
.100 69.8/53.9
.200 138.5/112.5
.300 195.9/148.0
.400 231.0/159.0
.500 232.2/161.6
.600 236.1/165.8
If these numbers are relatively correct, there would be no point in going to 1.6 rockers or a cam with more than mid .400s lift. FWIW I saw several flow charts for stock alum. heads that were also 'flat' from .400 lift up.
And then there's these numbers...
2nd data set: lift/intake/exhaust
.100 55.0/48.0
.200 119.0/91.0
.300 179.0/128.0
.400 214.0/140.0
.500 230.0/147.0
3rd data set:
.100 58.0/57.0
.200 117.0/107.0
.300 174.0/135.0
.400 207.0/146.0
.500 221.0/150.0
If sets 2&3 are 'accurate' then there should be some advantage to pushing the valve lift closer to .500 ...
Anyways, feedback would be appreciated.
Thanks