Dyno Simulator

[hempkat94z]

I cam across these sites and thought it was kinda cool.
http://www.geocities.com/motorcity/4601/hpcalc.html
http://www.tunercalcs.com/

[Fastbird]

Sweet!!! Says my Celica is a 12.8 car! (2700 lbs / 250 WHP).

Flaw is that Tunercalcs website is that it's probably basing it on a VERY hard short time which most cars out there aren't going to get.

[96lt1m6]

Sweet!!! Says my Celica is a 12.8 car! (2700 lbs / 250 WHP).

Flaw is that Tunercalcs website is that it's probably basing it on a VERY hard short time which most cars out there aren't going to get.

i have found some calculators are very close and others just simply should never be used....LOL,the only real problem i see with them is you cannot adjust for track conditions,weather conditions and different drivers. they operate under perfect conditions..how often would THAT occur?:whistle:

[hempkat94z]

I was really surprised how close it was to what it really ran. In my car I ran 12.98 at 104 with a full weight. I put my in 3700#s and what I estimate my horsepower which is 335hp and it said it ran 12.97. I am not exact on the weight nor hp but I think it is close.

[Camaro_94]

Awesome! Seems to be pretty accurate too.

[YZF]

No way in hell I make 341 HP!!!!!

[hempkat94z]

was that the flywheel hp or the rwhp. On one of them i believe it does both. what mods do you have? with what i have in my sig it was pretty damn close. Plus yours is a M6

[YZF]

was that the flywheel hp or the rwhp. On one of them i believe it does both. what mods do you have? with what i have in my sig it was pretty damn close. Plus yours is a M6

I just filled in the 2nd table on the geocities link...

[joe dirt]

When I did mine it was pretty close to the last time I was at the track and the last time I was on the dyno. 1/4 mile et was about .1 high and the hp was about 8 off. Not bad

[96lt1m6]

this would be very close if i was at sea level.
320whp
3540
12.97




another calculator says 12.88@109 (12.88@109) again at sea level at my DA i am 4-5 tenths slower definately believable.
to me using weight and 1/4mi speed are more accurate

http://www.fbody.com/calc.htm

[hempkat94z]

this would be very close if i was at sea level.
320whp
3540
12.97




another calculator says 12.88@109 (12.88@109) again at sea level at my DA i am 4-5 tenths slower definately believable.
to me using weight and 1/4mi speed are more accurate

http://www.fbody.com/calc.htm

Damn we would be one hell of a race. The better reaction time would win.

[hempkat94z]

That is a pretty cool site 96lt1m6

[96lt1m6]

in the video you will see the nasty bogg i had not just some excuse for a bad time. pre race bs goofin off you can FF 2.30min into video for racing

http://lvcfo.org/viewtopic.php?f=49&t=2176

[hempkat94z]

I saw what you are talking about. Hell you damn near stopped.....LOL
That is the reason I don't like M6s. A4s are a lot more consistant.
Was that a track rental? I would love to make some passes down the great STRIP

[96lt1m6]

no we have midnight meyham on select fridays so we try to get our entire club there on those days. we generally have a great time when we are not flooded with the ricer crowd!
i am certain i would have ran some 13 ohs but owell LOL
i would love to run at sea level,i may just make a trip to houston soon........

[YZF]

I saw what you are talking about. Hell you damn near stopped.....LOL
That is the reason I don't like M6s. A4s are a lot more consistant.
Was that a track rental? I would love to make some passes down the great STRIP


Come take a gander at my time slips. I think auto's make it easier to be consistant, but M6 cars are just fine.

[hempkat94z]

Don't get me wrong that was my opinion. I have owned several manual cars I just prefer a stalled auto. My fastest car I ever owned was an Muncie 4 speed in a 82 camaro. I was just stating that there are alot more variables that come into play to make a good pass with a M6. Proper RPM launch, right amount of slip on the clutch, missed shifts, but what is also nice about an M6 you can find that perfect launch RPM considering you can launch at any RPM you want and with an auto all you got is stall it or drop the hammer off idle but no missed shifts and no more changing clutches....lol

[96lt1m6]

M6 point taken, i know first hand that's why my real race car has an auto in it! this is my daily LOL!! i would not care as much if i was making the $ i was then i could replace my 10-bolt and install a much better clutch!

hows this for a bad ass 6speed?
http://videos.camaroz28.com/recentvideos/7/4badb761-12e7-423b-a31f-99c7016f0c46.htm

[hempkat94z]

Good ole Taner. I would love to have that car and be able to drive it like he does

[ksmyss]

No way in hell I make 341 HP!!!!!

its prolly cank hp. its telling me my bolt on bests were with 381 hp and i know it only had 335.

[meen95z]

says 567whp for a 125 trap speed.. Maybe 567 fwhp..

[96lt1m6]

this is a very effective calculator
http://www.modulardepot.com/density.php

[sdmws6]

I use cartest2000 and it's by far the best simulator I've experienced.

[Bowtie4Life]

using the car weight and trap speed, it comes out to 335.7 on all three that I have tried, but using e.t. and weight it only comes to 294, (2.18 60'). On one of them it said 294 whp, and 381 fwhp. Hmmmmmmm, time to get the car dynoed.

[Twisted Z]

I was suprised how accurate it was. on the slow side even ;)

[BIGT94z]

it says im 344 when i put down 304 LAWLS


this is a very effective calculator
http://www.modulardepot.com/density.php yes it is :metal: