View Full Version : "Boost your LS truck block... they love boost..." THEY SAID
popo8
07-10-2013, 07:28 AM
This is the 3rd or 4th junkyard block out of the mustang that belongs to a friend of mine. Its a light, gutted notch.... and the thing did make crazy power, and was a high 8 or low 9 sec car (I can find out specific numbers if necessary).
But I just wanted to post up pics of his latests catastrophy at the track.... He was throwing in excess of 20 lbs at the engine.... (I think its just has a good rotating assembly and cam in it).
21766217742177321772217712177021769217682176721775
popo8
07-10-2013, 07:54 AM
21777217762177821779
SexyTransAm
07-10-2013, 08:27 AM
Dude I was just watching youtube videos of that car lol.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I547 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
popo8
07-10-2013, 08:32 AM
Dude I was just watching youtube videos of that car lol.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I547 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
LOL.. Jace is a good friend of mine. If you look at my OCMD pics... lots of pics of his car....
Blackbird96WS6
07-10-2013, 08:37 AM
Holy crap, it looks like he has a whole junkyard in his oil pan! That sucks!
popo8
07-10-2013, 08:46 AM
Holy crap, it looks like he has a whole junkyard in his oil pan! That sucks!
He has actually been stock piling 6.0s so its like just another day for him..... They may be cheap to make power... and I know it holds together (reasonably) but how many times do you build it till the cost equates to doing it the more costly and "RIGHT" way later....
IDK, to each their own... all I know is he flys.. and that car will be back on the road by the weekend.
Chris
07-10-2013, 09:11 AM
Damn im impressed.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk 2
Paulster2
07-10-2013, 09:15 AM
@popo ... I'm sure you read the CHP article (I think it was CHP) where they used a 5.3L (later to find out is was actually a 4.8L) truck engine, threw two e-bay turbos on it, and boosted the crap out of it. The idea was to see at what point the stock block would fail. 60 some dyno runs and 27psi of boost later, the engine still had not given up the ghost ... stupid little thing was putting out over 1200hp ... and the engine never gave up (had controller issues and ran out of dyno time, I believe). They dropped a minimal amount of money into the combo. Something like this could possibly run an entire race season (or give them a run on Pinks-All Out -- haha!) ... and if it did give up, how much would it cost to replace a 4.8L long block?
On a separate note, I'm wondering if the shorter throw of the 4.8L crank might have given it some longevity? Just a thought.
Blackbird96WS6
07-10-2013, 09:19 AM
He has actually been stock piling 6.0s so its like just another day for him..... They may be cheap to make power... and I know it holds together (reasonably) but how many times do you build it till the cost equates to doing it the more costly and "RIGHT" way later....
IDK, to each their own... all I know is he flys.. and that car will be back on the road by the weekend.
No kidding, do it once, do it right... Spend more up front to save more in the long run...
popo8
07-10-2013, 09:20 AM
I did not read that... But soumds interesting...and i agree with ur theory that the small stroke make it stronger.
Co-Owner/Admin @ LTXtech.com
SexyTransAm
07-10-2013, 09:31 AM
@popo ... I'm sure you read the CHP article (I think it was CHP) where they used a 5.3L (later to find out is was actually a 4.8L) truck engine, threw two e-bay turbos on it, and boosted the crap out of it. The idea was to see at what point the stock block would fail. 60 some dyno runs and 27psi of boost later, the engine still had not given up the ghost ... stupid little thing was putting out over 1200hp ... and the engine never gave up (had controller issues and ran out of dyno time, I believe). They dropped a minimal amount of money into the combo. Something like this could possibly run an entire race season (or give them a run on Pinks-All Out -- haha!) ... and if it did give up, how much would it cost to replace a 4.8L long block?
On a separate note, I'm wondering if the shorter throw of the 4.8L crank might have given it some longevity? Just a thought.
Yes the shoter stroke had alot to do with it.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I547 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
SexyTransAm
07-10-2013, 09:33 AM
Watching his videos make me wanna hurry up on my turbo lq4 build goin in my 80 TA!
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I547 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
Fastbird
07-10-2013, 09:34 AM
It was an article in Hot Rod.....I may have it somewhere. They changed ring gaps, can, ported heads, but other than the rings the lower rotating assembly was only disassembled and inspected, the reassembled with the same bearings even. Pretty impressive considering you can get one for the $750 range at pretty much any junkyard.
Posted from my Rooted and ICS'd Rezound
Paulster2
07-10-2013, 09:39 AM
It was an article in Hot Rod.....I may have it somewhere. They changed ring gaps, can, ported heads, but other than the rings the lower rotating assembly was only disassembled and inspected, the reassembled with the same bearings even. Pretty impressive considering you can get one for the $750 range at pretty much any junkyard.
They said the only real reason they tore the engine down was to ensure they knew what they had to start with. IIRC, they only cleaned up the heads ... not a true porting job. Very impressive ...
Here's the article for those who might care: http://www.hotrod.com/techarticles/hrdp_1109_stock_gm_ls_engine_big_bang_theory/
Yup, you are correct about it being in HRM. I get both mags so forget where I read things sometimes.
EDIT: I stand corrected ... the heads were ported.
BLK95-Z
07-10-2013, 11:00 AM
They said the only real reason they tore the engine down was to ensure they knew what they had to start with. IIRC, they only cleaned up the heads ... not a true porting job. Very impressive ...
Here's the article for those who might care: http://www.hotrod.com/techarticles/hrdp_1109_stock_gm_ls_engine_big_bang_theory/
Yup, you are correct about it being in HRM. I get both mags so forget where I read things sometimes.
EDIT: I stand corrected ... the heads were ported. Whats even more impressive is they made over 60 pulls with that engine - most over 1000hp. I know a guy with a turbo L33 (aluminum 5.3) with nothing but valve springs and a cam. Makes over 700whp though a stalled th400 and 9" for over 2 years now. To his credit we have one of the best LSx tuners on the east coast right here in town.....
Paulster2
07-10-2013, 11:12 AM
Whats even more impressive is they made over 60 pulls with that engine - most over 1000hp.
Absolutely ... dyno pulls are not what I would call easy on an engine. 60 pulls back to back is working that thing pretty hard. Do you think it was broke in yet? :laugh:
I know a guy with a turbo L33 (aluminum 5.3) with nothing but valve springs and a cam. Makes over 700whp
That's about 840-ish to the flywheel ... not too shabby.
... To his credit we have one of the best LSx tuners on the east coast right here in town.....
Nothing wrong with that :-) Just in KY? If I am able to get into a 408 build like I want for my truck, I may come calling! Just have to find some money ....
BLK95-Z
07-10-2013, 11:35 AM
Absolutely ... dyno pulls are not what I would call easy on an engine. 60 pulls back to back is working that thing pretty hard. Do you think it was broke in yet? :laugh:
Yeah, Id say shes plenty broken in after that....lol. The gen IV's hold up so well its almost pointless to build a motor for anything less than 700whp.
SexyTransAm
07-10-2013, 12:07 PM
Whats even more impressive is they made over 60 pulls with that engine - most over 1000hp. I know a guy with a turbo L33 (aluminum 5.3) with nothing but valve springs and a cam. Makes over 700whp though a stalled th400 and 9" for over 2 years now. To his credit we have one of the best LSx tuners on the east coast right here in town.....
I assume you are talking about Anthony at fast track?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I547 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
BLK95-Z
07-10-2013, 12:27 PM
I assume you are talking about Anthony at fast track?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I547 using Tapatalk 4 BetaYes sir. Have you ever been to his shop?
Sahara54
07-10-2013, 12:45 PM
popo8 What is the blue fox running for engine management? Stock LS, Squirt, Xfi...
SexyTransAm
07-10-2013, 01:10 PM
Yes sir. Have you ever been to his shop?
No never been up there
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I547 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
firebird_1995
07-10-2013, 01:56 PM
*in a cookie monster voice*
Mmm pistons, nom nom nom nom.....
Most of the high boost success I've seen on the stock bottom end ls engines is from the 5.3 or 4.8. The 6.0 can do it too, but it seems like they fail at a higher rate than the smaller displacement engines.
Paulster2
07-10-2013, 02:03 PM
So, I was looking around on the Google search I saw this article (http://www.truckinweb.com/tech/engine/1213tr_vortec_5_3l_big_bang/viewall.html) from a sister publication of HRM, Truckin Magazine. They did the same basic test as HRM did, but used a LY7 for the test. I would bet, from the description of it, they actually used the same add-on parts HRM used (intake, turbos, intercooler, etc), though they used a lot better set of heads and a much more radical cam than HRM did. Final judgement: 1304 hp @ 24.2psi. They were trying to get the LY7 to blow up as well, but never quite got there either. They did have a lifter failure (what they were saying was caused by valve float ... ). Still showing a very stout engine here, no doubt about it. Just found it interesting is all.
Badbird_96
07-10-2013, 06:40 PM
Wonder what a lh6 will handle :D
BLK95-Z
07-10-2013, 07:49 PM
Wonder what a lh6 will handle :DAlot....after you delete the DOD :)
Badbird_96
07-10-2013, 08:38 PM
Yeah that could not be good for boost lol
Paulster2
07-11-2013, 05:11 AM
Wonder what a lh6 will handle :D
Alot....after you delete the DOD :)
Not know if your answer is sarcasm (doesn't seem to transmit through the ether for some reason ... ) ... seeing as how the LH6 is an aluminum block, I'm wondering how much boost it would actually handle? Also, I think you'll run into the same longevity issues popo is talking about from the beginning of this thread. JMHO, though.
Badbird_96
07-11-2013, 05:27 AM
It is a legit question but the joke part is i just bought my wife an envoy denali with the lh6 in it. Like she would let me boost it lol
Paulster2
07-11-2013, 05:33 AM
It is a legit question but the joke part is i just bought my wife an envoy denali with the lh6 in it. Like she would let me boost it lol
Bwahahahaha! I know EXACTLY what you are saying ... my wife tells me she would love an older Porsche 911, but tells me I'd not be able to touch it mechanically ... I'm like WHAT??? I don't think she'll ever be getting one under those conditions. There is no way I could EVER afford to allow someone else to work on a Porsche for her, or find one I could afford to buy which wouldn't require any work. So, I'm the bad guy because I haven't bought her dream car for her yet ... will it ever end.
joelster
07-11-2013, 05:46 AM
That timeslip has me baffled. It traps 122 in the 1/8th (which is FLYING) and then only goes 135 in the 1/4. It picked up 13mph. My car picks up roughly 25-27mph on the backhalf. Something was wrong or it's simply running out of gear. As far as the carnage, I'd bet his tune is just too aggresive. Those motors can make 800hp all day long if the tune is dead-on, and not hurt anything. It sounds like he has his shit together though, so maybe he just had a weaker 6.0 to start with? Just because you see a truck in the junkyard, doesn't mean the engine will be flawless. When you are at the boneyard looking for an engine or a transmission, look at the cars that were wrecked. A wrecked car means it was running when it went to the junkyard. A car sitting in the junkyard with a perfect body means it had a serious mechanical issue causing its demise.
Paulster2
07-11-2013, 06:53 AM
... When you are at the boneyard looking for an engine or a transmission, look at the cars that were wrecked. A wrecked car means it was running when it went to the junkyard. A car sitting in the junkyard with a perfect body means it had a serious mechanical issue causing its demise. VERY good advice :D
popo8
07-11-2013, 08:58 AM
That timeslip has me baffled. It traps 122 in the 1/8th (which is FLYING) and then only goes 135 in the 1/4. It picked up 13mph. My car picks up roughly 25-27mph on the backhalf. Something was wrong or it's simply running out of gear. As far as the carnage, I'd bet his tune is just too aggresive. Those motors can make 800hp all day long if the tune is dead-on, and not hurt anything. It sounds like he has his shit together though, so maybe he just had a weaker 6.0 to start with? Just because you see a truck in the junkyard, doesn't mean the engine will be flawless. When you are at the boneyard looking for an engine or a transmission, look at the cars that were wrecked. A wrecked car means it was running when it went to the junkyard. A car sitting in the junkyard with a perfect body means it had a serious mechanical issue causing its demise.
Well the slip i ded legit...
And he is in excess off 800hp... here is the thing...he just put a BIGGER turbo on it before its death..
Lol.
Co-Owner/Admin @ LTXtech.com
dawdaw
07-11-2013, 04:48 PM
@popo ... I'm sure you read the CHP article (I think it was CHP) where they used a 5.3L (later to find out is was actually a 4.8L) truck engine, threw two e-bay turbos on it, and boosted the crap out of it. The idea was to see at what point the stock block would fail. 60 some dyno runs and 27psi of boost later, the engine still had not given up the ghost ... stupid little thing was putting out over 1200hp ... and the engine never gave up (had controller issues and ran out of dyno time, I believe). They dropped a minimal amount of money into the combo. Something like this could possibly run an entire race season (or give them a run on Pinks-All Out -- haha!) ... and if it did give up, how much would it cost to replace a 4.8L long block?
On a separate note, I'm wondering if the shorter throw of the 4.8L crank might have given it some longevity? Just a thought.
It's impressive, but throw that set up in a car and take it to the track and see what happens.. first amount of load that motor gets, bye bye.. IMO unless you sincerely enjoy/like to work on a car, people that try to push the limits of a stock bottom end are trying to set a pretty retarded record. Your tuning window is extremely extremely small and at the end of the day, congrats you pushed a stock bottom car to a fast e.t. lol... I Really don't understand it but that's just me, you exert all your time, energy, effort and money into the power adder, top end, and the rest of the car and leave the part that takes the power, stock lol.. I just don't see any logic in it. it's basically like who has the biggest pecker/fastest car lol.
BLK95-Z
07-11-2013, 08:23 PM
It's impressive, but throw that set up in a car and take it to the track and see what happens.. first amount of load that motor gets, bye bye.. IMO unless you sincerely enjoy/like to work on a car, people that try to push the limits of a stock bottom end are trying to set a pretty retarded record. Your tuning window is extremely extremely small and at the end of the day, congrats you pushed a stock bottom car to a fast e.t. lol... I Really don't understand it but that's just me, you exert all your time, energy, effort and money into the power adder, top end, and the rest of the car and leave the part that takes the power, stock lol.. I just don't see any logic in it. it's basically like who has the biggest pecker/fastest car lol. A dyno doesn't put a load on the motor? Thats news to me....This guy has been blowing 22 pounds through his stock 4.8 for 2 seasons
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=onuPyd-OGCA[/URL] [URL]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tZJQzVsihvQ
popo8
07-11-2013, 08:38 PM
Depends on the dyno. A mustang dyno puts load on in one way...and a dyno jet does it by utilizing the brake.
Turbo guys usually like the mustamg dynos cause theybare more turbo friendly.
Co-Owner/Admin @ LTXtech.com
dawdaw
07-12-2013, 04:23 PM
A dyno doesn't put a load on the motor? Thats news to me....This guy has been blowing 22 pounds through his stock 4.8 for 2 seasons
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=onuPyd-OGCA[/URL] [URL]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tZJQzVsihvQ
no it does put a load, not close to the load it would see at the track, and ok...a dyno is a tad bit different than the track... and that's awesome bro you should jump on the bandwagon with him :jest: thanks for the video... you made your point with one person, probably ton's more like that guy right? :jest:
BLK95-Z
07-12-2013, 07:16 PM
no it does put a load, not close to the load it would see at the track, and ok...a dyno is a tad bit different than the track... and that's awesome bro you should jump on the bandwagon with him :jest: thanks for the video... you made your point with one person, probably ton's more like that guy right? :jest:You mad? I appoligize if that video hurt your feelings but I can post links to high hp 4.8 builds all night. I enjoy and respect both platforms like any true GM fan should. I think your the one on a bandwagon... :tt2: :jest:
Chris
07-12-2013, 08:07 PM
Ok ok I like big butts and I can not lie about this fact in specific
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk 2
Fastbird
07-12-2013, 09:00 PM
I think there's a misconception as to dyno's and loading here. Dynojets, at least the widely used 248C, are not able to place a load on the vehicle other than the load of the 3000lb drum being turned. Mustang dyno's, Dyno Dynamics dyno's, engine dyno's can all be loaded up to real world conditions using the vehicle weight, frontal surface area, etc. So yes, a dyno can indeed be loaded up and present an equal load as if on a track.
There's a handful of people running really well with turbo's and stock 5.3 motors. Not everyone runs well, but fact of the matter is that who cares if you grenade the 5.3? They're cheap, and tuned well will take a shit ton of abuse and keep on trucking. I believe the RX7 above is Skinnies and he's really pushed the limits of one, but he's also got an insanely light car to boot. His formula worked to his advantage. It doesn't for everybody. But if you can understand people wanting to go fast, do it cheaply, and aren't concerned about something popping, then you see the draw that the 5.3 motor has when coupled with a turbo. It's been done over and over, and will continue to be done with success.
popo8
07-12-2013, 10:18 PM
I think there's a misconception as to dyno's and loading here. Dynojets, at least the widely used 248C, are not able to place a load on the vehicle other than the load of the 3000lb drum being turned. Mustang dyno's, Dyno Dynamics dyno's, engine dyno's can all be loaded up to real world conditions using the vehicle weight, frontal surface area, etc. So yes, a dyno can indeed be loaded up and present an equal load as if on a track.
.....
Great explaination Sean
Co-Owner/Admin @ LTXtech.com
dawdaw
07-13-2013, 08:18 AM
You mad? I appoligize if that video hurt your feelings but I can post links to high hp 4.8 builds all night. I enjoy and respect both platforms like any true GM fan should. I think your the one on a bandwagon... :tt2: :jest:
extremely lol really got to my feelings :cry:.. on the same page as you I respect any platform, and anyone that builds and puts time, money, and effort into a car whether it's an import or muscle car or anything in between... pretty far from being on one bandwagon but go ahead and make ASSumptions it's quite funny:jest::jest: and ya you can post links all day, i'll be sure to read them and soak it in. It's funny all you see is the extremely small amount of people that have success with these motors, that are in 2000 lb cars.. but you can't see the countless failures with them though and how often there replacing shit. You should again, jump on the bandwagon with them, it's gotta be awesome to be just like everyone else :supergay:
BLK95-Z
07-13-2013, 12:25 PM
extremely lol really got to my feelings :cry:.. on the same page as you I respect any platform, and anyone that builds and puts time, money, and effort into a car whether it's an import or muscle car or anything in between... pretty far from being on one bandwagon but go ahead and make ASSumptions it's quite funny:jest::jest: and ya you can post links all day, i'll be sure to read them and soak it in. It's funny all you see is the extremely small amount of people that have success with these motors, that are in 2000 lb cars.. but you can't see the countless failures with them though and how often there replacing shit. You should again, jump on the bandwagon with them, it's gotta be awesome to be just like everyone else :supergay:I think its pretty obvious your "countless failure" argument is one sided and misinformed. BTW.... Ive been driving/modding LT1 Camaro's for the past 16 years
Chris
07-13-2013, 12:28 PM
Ok thats enough engines like boost until they break
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.