- Navigation
Results 1 to 10 of 11
-
05-11-2017, 01:55 PM #1Lurker
- Status
- Offline
- Join Date
- May 2017
- Name
- Jesse Ison-Bowman
- Vehicle
- 1997 Camaro Z-28
- Location
- Louisville, KY
- Posts
- 5
concerned with compression ratio LT1 383 build
Hi everyone, thanks in advance for any helpful comments to this post. i have a 97 z28 6 speed with a bad crank and bad cam bearings so i am putting together my rebuild and I keep running into pistons and engine kits that put the compression ratio up over 12:1 with the stock 54cc heads. this will not be a race motor, rather the opposite: i want to run 87 pump gas and it will be a daily driver / weekend warrior.
here is the set up i am considering based on feedback from the engine builder i am planning on using below. my question is regarding the pistons. since the LT1 comes stock around 10.5 : 1, will this engine run well? or does the reverse cooling flow and knock sensor allow / mandate a higher than normal compression ratio on the LT1 due to the nature of the beast?
scat 9000 crank
scat 6.0 inch forged pro series rods
wiseco forged -24cc dish pistons (according to builder this will put me at 10.05:1 compression ratio)
i am looking for a strong torquey and reliable motor that is smooth and streetable with plenty of power on tap for rowdy racing on the highway and the occasional drag race. so do you think this will be enough compression to accomplish my goals? 400 hp and 500 tq at the crank would be ideal but i know those are lofty numbers.
thanks guys!
-
05-11-2017, 02:41 PM #2LTx Guru
- Status
- Offline
- Join Date
- Apr 2013
- Name
- Fred
- Vehicle
- 1994 Formula - SOLD
- Location
- Central NJ
- Posts
- 2,279
A totally stock LT1 w/ 10.5:1 (sometimes shown as 10.4:1) static CR will retard the timing on 87 octane fuel, unless you are at some high altitude above sea level. The Owner's Manual requires 91 octane for max performance, and cautions you could lose performance with 87 octane. Why do you want to use 87? Will kill "strong, torquey".
The reverse flow cooling and aluminum heads allow the LT1 to use the higher compression ratio, with fairly aggressive timing. Does not "mandate"...... it "allows".Last edited by Injuneer; 05-11-2017 at 09:23 PM.
SOLD - GONE TO A (VERY) GOOD HOME ! - 94 Formula A3+1: 381ci forged stroker - Callies Stealth, Oliver 5.85 billet rods, BME nitrous pistons / CNC LT4 heads / CC solid roller / TH400+GearVendors OD / 4.11 Strange 12-bolt / 300-shot N2O / Spohn Suspension / roll bar / MoTeC M48 Pro engine management system /a few other odds 'n ends.
-
05-11-2017, 02:51 PM #3
OP
does your builder understand the LT1 reverse cooling....not like a Gen 1 SBC so "higher" compression with the LT1 can be 11:3 ish with 91 octane all day long. Your tune (timing) will also factor in what octane you want to use. If 87 than the tuner would have some timing pulled.
Did the builder say how far in or out of the hole the pistons would be with the wiseco pistons and what thickness of the head gasket he would use and target "quench" is says he is aiming for?96 BBB 383/T56
-
05-11-2017, 02:54 PM #4LTx Guru
- Status
- Offline
- Join Date
- Apr 2013
- Name
- Fred
- Vehicle
- 1994 Formula - SOLD
- Location
- Central NJ
- Posts
- 2,279
......
Last edited by Injuneer; 05-11-2017 at 06:17 PM.
SOLD - GONE TO A (VERY) GOOD HOME ! - 94 Formula A3+1: 381ci forged stroker - Callies Stealth, Oliver 5.85 billet rods, BME nitrous pistons / CNC LT4 heads / CC solid roller / TH400+GearVendors OD / 4.11 Strange 12-bolt / 300-shot N2O / Spohn Suspension / roll bar / MoTeC M48 Pro engine management system /a few other odds 'n ends.
-
05-11-2017, 05:33 PM #5Xtreme Member
- Status
- Offline
- Join Date
- Nov 2012
- Name
- Shaun
- Vehicle
- 1994 Formula
- Location
- Phillipsburg NJ
- Posts
- 7,249
Supporting Memberwith the same rods and pistons and an .040 compressed head gasket on stock heads we were at 9.25:1ish for boost......with the cut trick flows same gasket we are at 10.25ish. are you sure he is calculating static compression ratio correctly?
also, why regular gas? technically the lt1 should have premium stock. with how shit fuel is now adays I wouldn't build something to run regular
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk2021 Charger Scat 392
1994 Firebird Formula 381 stroker - Carrying the torch! - 9.90 @ 134.3mph on a 200 shot
The wrench/driver for LTConvert's 94 Z28- Ellwein 383/LE Trickflows/ D1SC / CPT Ultra Pro Race 4L60E
10.78 @ 125mph. Shooting for 9.99 for Frank Cahall!
-
05-11-2017, 08:41 PM #6
Need to know what your cam specs are for a better answer. Your dynamic compression ratio is far more relevant than the static compression ratio.
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
-
The Following User Says Thank You to miller09 For This Post:
-
06-09-2017, 03:44 PM #7Lurker
- Status
- Offline
- Join Date
- May 2017
- Name
- Jesse Ison-Bowman
- Vehicle
- 1997 Camaro Z-28
- Location
- Louisville, KY
- Posts
- 5
thanks for the reply my friend. i just totalled an 08 Dodge Charger with 5.7 hemi, long tube BBK headers, flowmasters, spectre CAI, and hptuners dyno tune that ran really well on 87. the goal for this camaro is a similar set up (v8 with mild tune and low comp ratio for pump gas, unrestricted.) I drive aggressively and just want to be able to keep my fuel costs down
-
06-09-2017, 03:46 PM #8Lurker
- Status
- Offline
- Join Date
- May 2017
- Name
- Jesse Ison-Bowman
- Vehicle
- 1997 Camaro Z-28
- Location
- Louisville, KY
- Posts
- 5
i haven't chosen a cam yet but i am open to suggestions. i am looking for 1500 to 5500 RPM and a slight lope would be acceptable. i want more torque than hp. my charger made 380 lb/ft to the rear wheels and 350 hp to the rear wheels. looking for similar power out of this 383 (but more)
-
06-09-2017, 03:48 PM #9Lurker
- Status
- Offline
- Join Date
- May 2017
- Name
- Jesse Ison-Bowman
- Vehicle
- 1997 Camaro Z-28
- Location
- Louisville, KY
- Posts
- 5
that is interesting. i don't know how he is calculating the CR to be totally honest and i need to study up on static CR, myself. i just want to run 87 to keep fuel costs down and have a reliable motor that won't detonate.
-
06-09-2017, 03:55 PM #10Lurker
- Status
- Offline
- Join Date
- May 2017
- Name
- Jesse Ison-Bowman
- Vehicle
- 1997 Camaro Z-28
- Location
- Louisville, KY
- Posts
- 5
that's exactly what i was hoping; for an aftermarket tune that would allow it to run well on 87. this is my first LT1 but basic engine knowledge tells me that i should be able to run 87 octane and 10:1 all day long. i am okay with losing a few hp due to the tune if necessary. this is not a race car by any means. i honestly did not question him on how far in or out the pistons would be and we didn't discuss quench, either. we were putting the parts together over the phone, he ran some numbers and told me the -24cc dish pistons would put me at the 10.05:1. he is aware it's and LT1 but he isn't an LT1 guy like you fellers
Bookmarks